Copyright on computer programs

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………..........

3

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS....................................................................................................

7

1. 1. LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE COMPUTER PROGRAMS ….....…………………..

8

1.1. LEGAL BASIS of the PROTECTION for the COMPUTER PROGRAMS …….…...

8

1.1.1. DEFINING the COMPUTER PROGRAMS ………………….……………….

11

1.1.2. COMPUTER PROGRAMS as the OBJECT for the REGULATION in laws....

14

1.2  COMPARISON of the LEGAL PROTECTION of the COMPUTER PROGRAMS in UKRAINE and the EUROPEAN UNION ……………………………………………...

20

2. CURRENT ISSUES OF THE PROTECTION OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS TO COMPUTER PROGRAMS …………………………………………………....

32

2.1. CURRENT ISSUES of the PROTECTION of the IP RIGHTS to the COMPUTER PROGRAMS in the THEORY and PRACTICE of law ……………………………...........

32

2.2. SEEKING the ways to SOLVE the PROBLEMS of the PROTECTION of the IP RIGHTS to the COMPUTER PROGRAMS …………………………………………..…..

45

2.3. ANALYSIS of COURT PRACTICE in the FIELD of PROTECTION of COMPUTER PROGRAMS………………………………………………………………..

51

CONCLUSIONS………………………………………………………………...………….....

62

RECOMMENDATIONS………………………………………………………………….......

64

LIST OF BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………..................................................................

67

ABSTRACT........................................................................................……………..….............

72

SUMMARY...............................................………………………………………..………......

73

ANNEXES…………………………………………………………………………….....…....

HONESTY DECALARATION ................................................................................................

LIST OF BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.      Andrés Guadamuz González. “Software Patentability: Emerging Legal Issues.” WIPO. Magazine. 2008. https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2008/06/article_0006.html

2.      "Archived copy." Archived from the original on 2013-05-13. Accessed 2012 December 13.

3.      Case Analysis: Alice Corp. v. Cls Bank (134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014)). http://www.mondaq.com/india/x/731008/Patent/Case+Analysis+Alice+Corp+V+Cls+Bank+134+S+Ct+2347+2014

4.      “Copyrigth Law.” Law School Case Briefs. Accessed 2019. http://www.invispress.com/law/copyright/apple.html

5.      “BAKER v. SELDEN.” Legal Information Institute. Accessed 2019.  https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/101/99

1. Belousov A.. “Provedenie ekspertizy na predmet kontrafaktnosti: Forum, posvyaschennyy problemam borby s kompyuternoy prestupnostyu.” Accessed 2019. http://cubercrime.zp.ua/viewtopic. php?p=2250&sid=b07db974c666c2ad05d3820954d26c7e.
2. “Bilski v. Kappos.” Accessed 2019. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilski_v._Kappos